Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Merel Hoedt vs Mina Hodzic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hoedt vs Hodzic analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On This Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Merel Hoedt vs Mina Hodzic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Hoedt 0 - 0 Hodzic
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hoedt has won 41.55% of points on their second serve, while Hodzic has won 47.12%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hoedt, in recent form, has won 57.65% of their opponent's second serve points, while Hodzic has won 62.88%. The same stats for first serve returns are 43.74% and 40.98% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hoedt has saved 53.04% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hodzic has saved 52.49% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hoedt has won 61.19% of matches played (W/L 41/ 26), with Hodzic winning 67.8% (W/L 40/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hoedt has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 106/ 82), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Hodzic has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 8/ 5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 13/ 10).
- Player level: In the last year, Hoedt has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.63% of matches (W/L 20/ 18), where as Hodzic has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 80.65% of matches (W/L 25/ 6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hoedt has played against opponents with an average rank of 177.22 while Hodzic has played against players with an average rank of 97.47.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hoedt has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hodzic has won 30% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hoedt has converted 52.98% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hodzic has converted 45.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
520
Rank
468
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
707
Rank
477
High
22
Age
Plays
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
55% (163-134)
Career Total W/L
59% (112-78)
57% (17-13)
YTD W/L
62% (23-14)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Merel Hoedt vs Mina Hodzic For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Hoedt VS Hodzic
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Merel Hoedt | Mina Hodzic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 57% (17/13) | 62% (23/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 60% (40/27) | 64% (51/29) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (335/276) | 58% (409/302) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 58% (11/8) | 62% (23/14) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.1 | 0.12 |
| Aces Total | 31 | 42 |
| DFs per game | 0.63 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 187 | 80 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:51:28 | 1:21:47 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 234.03 | 116.38 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (1267/1924) | 67% (1298/1941) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (781/1267) | 60% (778/1298) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (273/657) | 47% (303/643) |
| BPs Won% Total | 53% (151/285) | 45% (136/300) |
| Return Pts W% | 49% (1004/2044) | 49% (1008/2074) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 56% (9/7) | 56% (14/11) |
| Futures W/L | 57% (8/6) | 75% (9/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 59% (17/29) | 61% (22/36) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 29% (2/7) | 56% (5/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 17% (1/6) | 14% (1/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 89% (18/16) | 81% (27/22) |
| 1st set W, L | 11% (18/2) | 19% (27/5) |
| 1st set L, W | 8% (12/1) | 10% (10/1) |
Merel Hoedt Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Valentina Ivanov
Player
Merel Hoedt
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
2
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
8
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
51%
(
36 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
74
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 7-6(6) 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Anet Angelika Koskel
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Solana Sierra
Player
Merel Hoedt
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
24 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Angelina Wirges
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
51%
(
30 of
59)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
9
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Anna Klasen
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Merel Hoedt
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
28 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sina Herrmann
Player
Merel Hoedt
64%
(
58 of
91)
1st Serve %
52%
(
51 of
98)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
18
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
16 of
47)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
52%
(
47 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
54 of
98)
98
Total Points Won
91
|
7-5 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Valerija Maija Kargina
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Tilde Stromquist
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
6
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
44)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
48%
(
27 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
42 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maelys Bougrat
Player
Merel Hoedt
48%
(
41 of
86)
1st Serve %
54%
(
59 of
109)
2
Aces
5
11
Double Faults
25
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
36%
(
16 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
15 of
50)
45%
(
9 of
20)
Break Points Won
75%
(
9 of
12)
57%
(
49 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
57 of
109)
94
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Mina Hodzic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mina Hodzic
Player
Briana Szabo
67%
(
80 of
120)
1st Serve %
64%
(
86 of
135)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
53 of
86)
65%
(
26 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
29%
(
6 of
21)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
39%
(
47 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
58 of
135)
131
Total Points Won
124
|
6-7(4) 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mina Hodzic
Player
Vlada Katic
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Denisa Hindova
Player
Mina Hodzic
76%
(
75 of
99)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
84)
8
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
40 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
84)
92
Total Points Won
91
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Cagla Buyukakcay
Player
Mina Hodzic
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
80)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
7
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jenny Lim
Player
Mina Hodzic
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
72
Total Points Won
50
|
2-6 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lola Radivojevic
Player
Mina Hodzic
56%
(
56 of
100)
1st Serve %
61%
(
60 of
98)
3
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
4
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
39 of
60)
45%
(
20 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
41 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
101
Total Points Won
97
|
7-6(2) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mina Hodzic
Player
Anika Jaskova
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
76)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mina Hodzic
Player
Kaja Najzer
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Denise Hrdinkova
Player
Mina Hodzic
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve %
75%
(
60 of
80)
2
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
23 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mina Hodzic
Player
Ingrid Vojcinakova
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
10
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Hoedt Vs Hodzic Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Hoedt are available here and Hodzic photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Mina Hodzic
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
